Performance Analysis
The Z68AP-D3 may be cheap, but it should still be quick in our tests. After all, our i5-2500K is no slouch in either 2D applications or games. Thankfully we weren’t disappointed, as the board’s scores were in line with other Z68-based motherboards we’ve seen.
Its result of 1,582 in the image editing portion of the test, for instance, was quicker than the vastly more expensive
ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3. The GA-Z68AP-D3's video encoding performance was also good, placing it third in our stock speed table above even the Premium-Grade-wearing
MSI P67A-GD53.
These results mean that the Z68AP-D3 scored a very reasonable overall score 1,920 - right in the middle of the table of other, more expensive boards that we’ve tested. Its gaming performance also proved to be reasonably competitive at stocks speeds, as the board's minimum frame rate of 89fps was equal to other good boards such as the
Asus P8P67.
We were glad to see the stock speed results of the Z68AP-D3 match up to the other boards we’ve seen, but in truth we expected this. However, we weren't so uncertain about the board's overclocking prowess; how would such a cheap board stand up to having extra voltage shoved through its circuits?
Well, as it turns out, really rather well. We started off tentatively, glancing nervously at the VRM circuitry every time something made a noise in the labs but we needn’t have bothered - the board proved perfectly stable. After a little tinkering we even had our test chip running at a heady 4.9GHz - a full 1.6GHz faster than its rated speed and only a couple of hundred MHz slower than the best result we’ve seen.
At these settings it’s not surprising that the board sliced through our benchmarks like a Superlaser cuts through Alderaan, just without the millions of voices crying out in terror. Its overall benchmark score of 2,678 is very impressive for such a cheap board.
Gaming performance also reacted well to the extra frequency on tap, with the minimum frame rate jumping from 73fps to 80fps. However, we did have to pump an extra 0.16V through the CPU Vcore to keep this overclock stable - a marginally higher amount than the more expensive boards we’ve tested. This indicates that the Z68AP-D3 suffers from slightly more Vdroop than boards built around more premium components, which is unsurprising. We also had to push the QPI/VTT to 1.24V, the SA voltage to 1.055V and the PLL to 1.94V.
Conclusion
We’re slightly flabbergasted by the Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3. It hits a surprising price point for a decent Z68-based motherboard, and in doing so makes one of the key features of the Z68 chipset (Smart Response) actually relevant. This is great news, and when twinned with its good performance and overclocking, makes the board very appealing.
It’s not for everyone, of course. Those looking to build a more premium system will prefer the enthusiast features, extra USB 3 ports and better VRM cooling built into boards such as the
Asus Gene-Z. For those sitting on the fence about an upgrade to LGA1155, though, the cheap price of the Z68AP-D3 should offer enough persuasion to take the plunge.
Want to comment? Please log in.
Posted by Hustler - Tue Oct 11 2011 12:24
Oh...great, give us the inferior dual card system, why dont you.......
If your only going to give us one, then at least let it be Nvidia's, which seems to be a far more stable and reliable dual card system.
Seriously Gigabyte....i do wish you'd used SLI
Posted by Xir - Tue Oct 11 2011 12:44
Fast response (and sometimes encoding on the iGPU) for very little more. How is this not a win?
Posted by favst89 - Tue Oct 11 2011 12:49
As for the x-fire SLI. I have not tried either so as to which is better I can't comment.
I believe SLI certification requires 2 slots with x8 lanes each. Whereas x-fire only requires x8 and x4. I assume this means extra cost for components/wiring of some form. It may also cost gigabyte a fee to have the certification in the first place.
Posted by damien c - Tue Oct 11 2011 13:56
I know when I was running SLI'd GTX 580's when I installed the Nvidia Driver's I alway's got the message that the bottom card was running, slow because it wasn't in a high speed slot.
As for this board not having SLI it could put people off buying it who may want to SLI some cheap Nvidia card's, like the GTX 560's but what it offers is fine for those who decide to use 2x ATI card's or a single GTX 590.
Seem's like a decent board for someone on a budget but for someone with enough cash to buy something decent like a SLI rig they need to spend, more on a board and unless you can get a board that will give both card's the 16x speed then I think they should look, at the X58 setup's as they will give each card the full speed available to them.
Good Job Gigabyte keep it up!